Sports Diplomacy or Sportswashing: The Geopolitics of Global Sporting Events

Athletic competitions as diplomatic battleground

August 30, 2024

$7.5B
profit from Qatar World Cup
172
people executed in Saudi Arabia in 2022
15
Russian Olympic athletes competing as 'neutrals'

In 2034, Saudi Arabia will host the FIFA World Cup, marking another milestone in the country's ambitious sports strategy. This decision follows the joint hosting of the 2030 World Cup by Morocco, Spain, and Portugal. These events highlight the increasing intertwining of sports, politics, and international relations.

Sports have long been viewed as a tool for diplomacy, fostering international cooperation and understanding. The Olympic Games, for instance, have historically been seen as a platform for promoting peace and unity among nations. Countries hosting major sporting events often aim to showcase their culture, boost their global image, and stimulate economic growth.

However, critics argue that some nations use these events for "sportswashing" - using sports to distract from human rights abuses or other controversial issues. Recent examples have sparked heated debates:

  1. The 2022 Qatar World Cup faced scrutiny over workers' rights and LGBTQ+ issues.
  2. The 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics saw diplomatic boycotts from several countries over China's human rights record.
  3. Russian and Belarusian athletes face ongoing bans from various international competitions due to the invasion of Ukraine.
  4. Gulf states' ownership of European football clubs has raised concerns about the influence of state actors in sports.

These controversies have placed athletes in difficult positions, caught between their sporting aspirations and calls for political statements. Sports organizations, striving to remain neutral, often find themselves criticized for "politicizing" events when addressing human rights concerns.

The tension between sports diplomacy and sportswashing raises several questions:

  1. Can hosting major sporting events genuinely improve a country's human rights record, or does it merely provide cover for ongoing abuses?
  2. Should sports remain "neutral," or do they have a responsibility to address political and human rights issues?
  3. How can we distinguish between legitimate sports diplomacy and sportswashing?
  4. What role should athletes play in addressing political issues surrounding sporting events?
  5. How can the international community balance the celebration of sports with the need to address human rights concerns?

Where do you stand on this issue and why? What arguments might change your perspective? How do you think the relationship between sports and politics will evolve in the coming years?

Interested in joining?
We're always on the look for bold thinkers to share their expertise and perspective
Apply

Backgrounders